James, according to some witnesses, you have been in an embarassing location with a superstar whose name or gender I'm not authorized to announce. Do you wish to comment?
If you mean F.Y., then it was an absolutely innocuous thing. I deny any other "situation", expecially one with G.B...
I may have a photo.
You know, the photo has surely appeared spontaneously...
Spontaneously? I do not understand.
Yes, probably some wandering photons spontaneously originated an absolutely random photo in which you wrongly recognized me. For example, given the right conditions, your spouse or your office may "spontaneously" fly into pieces. Capisce?
I think you are right, this is probably a photo of my mother-in-law...
Do you do your own shopping?
I'm too hard-pressed performing significant things and I can't waste time on such technicalities. Actually, I hire a bunch of shopping gurus to elaborate my grocery list and pass it along to a squad of professional buyers around the world. For the clothes, I ever retain a number of stand-in, one for each body part.
Who were you in your first school play?
I remember it well. It was a play on the life of Julius Caesar. I was at the ticket boot.
Could you refute the hearsay about your participation in the shady affair of Bigfoot DNA samples?
Thou, mewling fool-born codpiece! How do you dare?
In an article printed on Australasian Semiotic Studies, dr. Henry Rodriguez observed that your roles are "a tragic summary of modern conceptual eclecticism". Any comment?
Yes, I think that in his recent letter published on Russian Semiotic Transactions, prof. William A. Richardson totally discredited that eccentric observation.
• e-mail: yutmeyut -at- gmail.com • Disclaimer & Privacy •